I hopped on my bike today to ride over to Mill Rd to visit my favorite Asian grocery store, and amazingly, I didn't need to wear either hat or gloves. Nice mild temperatures-- things have definitely warmed up. Can spring be on the way??? I hope so (and having written this, I hope we don't get a snow storm tomorrow). The shopping trip was a bust, unfortunately-- the store was completely out of tofu. I'll have to postpone my "mapo tofu" dinner until next week.
Amy is biking in to work this week, since I need the car to drive the kids up to the Chesterton Sports Center for their half term entertainment. She has been borrowing my bike for her commute, since it is in slightly better shape than hers (I took hers for my trip to the market). Both our bikes are a little elderly at this point, but hers seems to "complain" the most -- it has a whole repertoire of weird creaking and clicking noises. Time to buy her a new one... although maybe not until we get back to the USA.
Random scribblings about life in our family. This blog was started back in 2008 when we moved to Cambridge (UK) for a year.
Tuesday, February 17, 2009
Wednesday, February 11, 2009
Apres la Neige, le Deluge
After the snow fest last week, we had heavy rain, which resulted in a bit of flooding around the areas closest to the river Cam. The Cam is surprisingly meek and mild-mannered as rivers go-- the actual river bed is not very large at all. I get the sense that it just doesn't ever rain very heavily here, since it's clear that the river doesn't have the capacity to carry much flood water without jumping its banks.
Here is another shot of the river from the bike bridge.
Here is another shot of the river from the bike bridge.
Monday, February 2, 2009
Snow!
We got about 2-3 inches of snow tonight, much to the kids delight. The newspaper and radio are filled with dire transportation-related warnings, of course; there was one article saying that people should "not attempt to drive anywhere on the highways without bringing food, water, and extra clothing" (heh). Here is a familiar scene; you can easily imagine that this is New England if you squint:
Here's another photo, this one of Lydia. I took this halfway through our bike ride to school, just after we crossed the footbridge over the river Cam. You can't see it, but I know for a fact that there is a big grin on Lydia's face underneath her wraps. Saint Faiths was open in spite of the snow (somewhat surprising in fact, given that many of the staff and the kids have to travel a fair ways to get there each day).
Here's another photo, this one of Lydia. I took this halfway through our bike ride to school, just after we crossed the footbridge over the river Cam. You can't see it, but I know for a fact that there is a big grin on Lydia's face underneath her wraps. Saint Faiths was open in spite of the snow (somewhat surprising in fact, given that many of the staff and the kids have to travel a fair ways to get there each day).
Political Scandals
There have been two news items in the papers this year in the UK that I have found particularly interesting to follow.
The first has been the Damian Green affair, a scandal in which a Tory (opposition) MP was arrested this fall as part of an investigation into "leaks" (details of various government plans and programs given to the media). Green had his office in Westminster searched and was arrested, along with suffering various other indignities. Virtually everyone (with the exception of a few members of the Gordon Brown administration who had been the target of the leaks) agreed that the arrest was politically motivated and should never have happened; it was clear that Green had been acting in the best interests of the country by disclosing issues/problems with the way the government was being run. On the other hand, there was not, in fact, any law preventing the arrest: the police were completely above board.
The second item is the so-called "cash for amendments" scandal in which a newspaper (Sunday Times) arranged for a collection of "fake" businessmen to meet with various members of the House of Lords; during these meetings the peers (House of Lords members) offered to delay or amend bills/legislation, in return for substantial yearly retainers (anywhere from 25 to 100 thousand pounds). There was again universal agreement that if the newspaper accounts were correct, the peers in question should be removed for corruption. As it turns out, however, there isn't actually any law that provides for getting rid of a peer who has done something dastardly-- members of the House of Lords can be scolded & reprimanded, but not removed.
Seeing this aspect of the UK political system in action does tend to make you reflect on the one back home, and how such things would be handled in the US. On the one hand, the US Constitution (as I understand it) does insures that legislators can't be arrested while Congress is in session and they are actively engaged in their jobs. Once a legislator gets in her car to go home, however: fair game for arrest. With respect to tossing out "bad apples": clearly the Constitution has explicit procedures for impeachment, no problems there. In the UK it seems that there are more gray areas. This isn't to say that the system doesn't work, of course. The "row" following the Green arrest was substantial, and it seems certain (at least to me) that he won't be prosecuted. For the House of Lords scandal, it also seems extremely unlikely that the peers in question will be allowed to continue on-- people will figure out some way to get rid of them or force them to resign. So the system functions properly, just without the same degree of explicit legal backing.
The first has been the Damian Green affair, a scandal in which a Tory (opposition) MP was arrested this fall as part of an investigation into "leaks" (details of various government plans and programs given to the media). Green had his office in Westminster searched and was arrested, along with suffering various other indignities. Virtually everyone (with the exception of a few members of the Gordon Brown administration who had been the target of the leaks) agreed that the arrest was politically motivated and should never have happened; it was clear that Green had been acting in the best interests of the country by disclosing issues/problems with the way the government was being run. On the other hand, there was not, in fact, any law preventing the arrest: the police were completely above board.
The second item is the so-called "cash for amendments" scandal in which a newspaper (Sunday Times) arranged for a collection of "fake" businessmen to meet with various members of the House of Lords; during these meetings the peers (House of Lords members) offered to delay or amend bills/legislation, in return for substantial yearly retainers (anywhere from 25 to 100 thousand pounds). There was again universal agreement that if the newspaper accounts were correct, the peers in question should be removed for corruption. As it turns out, however, there isn't actually any law that provides for getting rid of a peer who has done something dastardly-- members of the House of Lords can be scolded & reprimanded, but not removed.
Seeing this aspect of the UK political system in action does tend to make you reflect on the one back home, and how such things would be handled in the US. On the one hand, the US Constitution (as I understand it) does insures that legislators can't be arrested while Congress is in session and they are actively engaged in their jobs. Once a legislator gets in her car to go home, however: fair game for arrest. With respect to tossing out "bad apples": clearly the Constitution has explicit procedures for impeachment, no problems there. In the UK it seems that there are more gray areas. This isn't to say that the system doesn't work, of course. The "row" following the Green arrest was substantial, and it seems certain (at least to me) that he won't be prosecuted. For the House of Lords scandal, it also seems extremely unlikely that the peers in question will be allowed to continue on-- people will figure out some way to get rid of them or force them to resign. So the system functions properly, just without the same degree of explicit legal backing.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
-
Lydia decided to do her science fair project this year on "Oobleck". Oobleck is basically corn starch mixed with water (not too mu...
-
A post about a second PCT ( Pacific Crest Trail ) section hike, this one up in Washington State (previous encounter with the PCT here ). I ...
-
Now that Ethan's braces are finally off (after 3+ years), it's Lydia's turn. The before and after photos: The evil tortu...